EOIR, June 5, 2023 " EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW (EOIR) OFFICE OF POLICY ATTORNEY 5107 LEESBURG PIKE FALLS CHURCH , VA 22041 UNITED STATES ...
Cyrus D. Mehta, Kaitlyn Box, June 5, 2023 "The new ETA 9089 form has gone into effect and DOL stopped using the old version of the form on the evening of May 31, 2023. The new form does not have...
Cyrus Mehta, May 29, 2023 "I write this blog in fond memory of Mark Von Sternberg who passed away on May 16, 2023. Mark was a brilliant lawyer, scholar and writer who worked very hard on behalf...
Portillo v. DHS "Gerardo A. Portillo petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") affirming his order of removal and denying his application for adjustment...
State Department, May 30, 2023 "Document Submission to KCC suspended for DV-2024 and onward. Effective for the Diversity Visa (DV) program for fiscal year 2024 (DV-2024) and onward, selectees...
NILA, Nov. 8, 2021
"Three Temporary Protected Status (TPS) holders filed a class action lawsuit challenging U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ decision to rescind a decades-old policy which allowed them to seek lawful permanent resident status (green cards).
Immigration law permits TPS holders to travel abroad temporarily with prior agency approval. For nearly three decades, USCIS and its predecessor found such individuals, upon their lawful return to the United States, to have been “inspected and admitted or paroled”—one of the requirements for gaining lawful permanent resident status. In August 2020, however, USCIS adopted Matter of Z-R-Z-C-, an Administrative Appeals Office decision holding that a TPS holder’s lawful return did not satisfy the inspection and admission or parole requirement. Instead, under current policy, TPS holders who first entered the United States without inspection are found ineligible for green cards even after they are subsequently inspected upon returning from travel abroad.
All Plaintiffs have maintained TPS for at least twenty years and now seek to become lawful permanent residents through their U.S. citizen spouses. They all traveled abroad temporarily with permission and lawfully returned to the United States after August 2020. All of them would be eligible for green cards but for USCIS’s current policy, which does not recognize them as being inspected and admitted or paroled.
Represented by the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, National Immigration Litigation Alliance, and Law Offices of Stacy Tolchin, the plaintiffs allege that USCIS’s policy violates the Immigration and Nationality Act and agency regulations. The lawsuit asks the court to prohibit the agency from applying the new policy and to order USCIS to reopen and readjudicate any class members’ applications that were denied.
“In adopting Matter of Z-R-Z-C- as agency policy, USCIS shut the door to permanent residency for an untold number of noncitizens who have lived for years in lawful Temporary Protected Status,” said Mary Kenney, Deputy Director of the National Immigration Litigation Alliance. “The decision—which abruptly reversed three decades of agency policy—is legally flawed and unnecessarily harsh.”
“USCIS’s policy violates the admissions framework Congress created and harms valued members of our community,” said Leila Kang, a staff attorney at NWIRP. “TPS holders who have built their families and livelihoods in the U.S. should not be deprived of the opportunity to remain with their loved ones.”
The complaint can be viewed here."
#####
Media contacts:
Mary Kenney, National Immigration Litigation Alliance(617) 819-4681; [email protected]
Leila Kang, Northwest Immigrant Rights Project(206) 816-3847; [email protected]